Atlas/Casebook
Casebook
The Casebook is a register of audited deployments of artificial intelligence in viticulture, winemaking and the wine business. It holds 299 records, and every one of them was checked against its original source and graded for how reliable that source is.
The corpus was assembled in August 2026 in three waves: the main regions and domains, then the regions and topics those missed, then the Russian market and the industry’s business edges — insurance, logistics, regulators. 177 records are about the vineyard, 47 about the cellar and the laboratory, 75 about business, marketing and hospitality. The tilt towards the vineyard is not an editorial choice: a satellite, a drone and a weather station produce thousands of observations a season; fermentation, dozens a year. The keynote on AI in wine sets out what follows from that asymmetry: what already works, and what becomes normal within five years.
What counted as a case
Three conditions, all required
- Wine
- The record concerns wine, wine grapes or the wine business.
- 01
- An algorithm
- It has an algorithmic component.
- 02
- A source
- It is backed by a source that was actually opened and read.
- 03
We drew the boundary around AI wide and wrote it out in full, in both directions: the industry uses the word loosely, and an unstated definition would have made the catalogue impossible to check.
| Counts as AI | Does not count |
|---|---|
| Machine learning of any kind, from logistic regression and random forest to deep networks | Measurement without prediction — refractometry, chromatography, biosensors, differential thermal analysis |
| Computer vision and image recognition | Cryptography and blockchain |
| Time-series forecasting on weather and sensor data | Arithmetic on fixed coefficients |
| Chemometrics and spectroscopy paired with classifiers | Classical BI reporting |
| Large language models | GIS layers overlaid without a predictive model |
| Recommender systems | |
| Autonomous navigation with machine perception | |
| Optimisation learned from data |
The boundary does not fall where the industry puts it. Seven well-known systems sit outside it though described as AI almost everywhere: Amorim NDtech’s gas chromatography, Anton Paar’s inline refractometry, Selinko’s cryptographic tag, eProvenance’s fixed rules, Sentia’s biosensor strips, the IWCA emissions calculator and WinePulse’s BI reporting. None learns and none predicts. The reverse also happens — the word “AI” comes from a journalist rather than the company: neither “artificial intelligence” nor “machine learning” appears once on Oculyze’s or Vinescapes’ own pages for the products in the catalogue, and the first of the two does use AI by our definition.
Under that frame 287 records are AI cases proper. A further 5 are borderline, and 7 describe adjacent technologies with no AI component; they are kept and labelled, because the absence of AI where the industry claims it tells the reader as much as its presence.
How to read a record
Two fields should be read before the rest, and both are filters in the register.
Source confidence
- A
- A peer-reviewed publication, an official EU or ministry report, or independent press with figures.
- 109
- B
- Trade press or a company’s own announcement with checkable detail.
- 110
- C
- A vendor marketing claim with no independent confirmation; read those figures as “according to the company”.
- 61
- Not stated
- The peer-reviewed research section, where the paper is the source.
- 19
The confidence level rates the source, not the case: the higher the grade, the better established what the record says.
Maturity stage
- Research
- In the laboratory or the literature.
- 83
- Pilot
- Running on a real site, not yet in production.
- 54
- Commercial operation
- Sold and running.
- 129
- Scaled
- Beyond the first estate or the first market.
- 18
- Closed
- Ended, acquired or wound down.
- 11
- Stage not established
- Not a point on that ladder but the absence of one: the record’s own sources do not establish a stage. Until the audit these were filed as commercial operation beside a caveat saying exactly that.
- 4
The stage says where a case stands on that ladder. Commercial operation and scale together are just under half the catalogue, and the half is less solid than it sounds: 40 of those 147 rest on a grade-C source alone — running commercially on the vendor’s word and nothing else. Most of the rest has not left the laboratory or the pilot, or has already ended. Several of those pilots are in their fifth to eighth year, a finding in itself — getting the model onto an estate takes longer than building it.
What is deliberately not here
Forecasts, market sizing and vendor rankings. The confidence level grades the source and says nothing about the product; the stage says how far a case got and nothing about how good it is. Nor are unverified leads here — a mention with no link, or a link with no grapes behind it, does not become a record, however interesting it sounds.
Absence is recorded too. Ten business edges of the industry were checked on purpose and eight came back empty.
Checked and empty
- Vineyard valuation
- Auction estimation of bottles
- Nurseries and planting material
- Bottle lightweighting
- Shelf analytics
- Water and carbon reporting
- Dealcoholisation
- Vineyard labour management
None of the eight held a deployment with a learned model and a checkable result. There are no records for them in the catalogue.
The published data
Everything the register draws from is published as a dated release, under CC BY-SA 4.0: all 299 records in one file, in two formats.
- Casebook v2026-09-29 (JSON, 553 KB) — the records, the 5 facet vocabularies with their counts, and a description of every field in both languages, so the file can be read without this site.
- Casebook v2026-09-29 (CSV, 332 KB) — the same records and the same columns, one row each, for a spreadsheet.
Two numbers identify a record and they are not the same number. id runs from 1
to 299 without gaps, and is what this site links to; catalogId is the
source catalogue’s original sequence, which reaches 307 with eight gaps where
the audit deleted a record. Join on id.
Releases accumulate and none is overwritten, so a dated file keeps resolving after the corpus is next corrected: cite the file, not this page. The licence asks for attribution and a note of what you changed.
How to cite
The plain line suits a bibliography; the BibTeX entry, a reference manager.
Nikita Khudov. Vinum ex Machina Casebook: audited cases of AI in wine, v2026-09-29 (2026). https://vinumexmachina.com/casebook/casebook-v2026-09-29.json. CC BY-SA 4.0.
@misc{khudov-casebook-v2026-09-29,
author = {Nikita Khudov},
title = {Vinum ex Machina Casebook: audited cases of AI in wine},
version = {v2026-09-29},
year = {2026},
url = {https://vinumexmachina.com/casebook/casebook-v2026-09-29.json},
note = {CC BY-SA 4.0}
} The same files are deposited on Zenodo with a DOI. Cite this dataset: Khudov, N. (2026). Vinum ex Machina Casebook: an audited register of 299 AI applications in viticulture, winemaking and the wine business (Version v2026-09-29) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23039821